What could discharge millions of tons of particulates linked to chemtrails? What contains metals like aluminum and mercury found in snowy samples? Could these affect rainfall patterns and interact with military tech? The EPA hints at possible substances for chemtrails. Coal plants release toxic waste; companies offer to take it away. EPA claims reusing coal fly ash has environmental benefits. How to reconcile this? Further details available at the provided link.
The EPA provides a major clue about chemtrails' toxic makeup With very serious implications. I am only starting my explorations in this area, but our Sept 6-7 symposium will have more Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:37:11 GMT https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-epa-provides-a-major-clue-about What would be cheap enough to discharge at the millions of tons level/year to cause the fine particulates in chemtrails?
What might contain the large variety of metals such as aluminum, barium, strontium, cadmium, arsenic, mercury that various scientists have found when testing environmental samples of ‘smoky’ snow or other sample materials that have received a visible (or invisible) dusting?
What might have profound effects that could control where rainfall occurs? Ever hear of weather warfare? And could sprayed particulates interact with EMFs and radar in ways that are useful to the military?
Did the EPA give us some hints about what might be sprayed to form the nearly ubiquitous sky-despoiling chemtrails?
There are a lot of coal-burning plants in the world. Those living nearby are said to have been subjected to toxic loads of mercury and other things.
130 million tons of toxic waste/year that companies will pay you to take away!
But wait! EPA says the quiet part out loud. Reusing coal fly ash “can create …environmental benefits, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions…”
How can they explain that one away?
Here is something to think about. I give you page 1. The rest can be found at this link: