Goal: Compare health systems in 10 countries, including the U.S., for improvement insights. Methods: Analyzed 70 health measures across access, process, efficiency, equity, and outcomes. Findings: Australia, the Netherlands, and the UK excel; U.S. dramatically underperforms, lacking universal coverage. Conclusion: U.S. health care fails compared to other countries, which meet basic needs effectively. OECD data supports this trend; reform is needed.
Commonwealth Fund again find the US healthcare system worthy only of derision No surprise. The worse the outcomes, the better the system is paid Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:32:47 GMT https://merylnass.substack.com/p/commonwealth-fund-again-find-the https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024
Abstract:
Goal : Compare health system performance in 10 countries, including the United States, to glean insights for U.S. improvement.
Methods : Analysis of 70 health system performance measures in five areas: access to care, care process, administrative efficiency, equity, and health outcomes.
Key Findings : The top three countries are Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, although differences in overall performance between most countries are relatively small. The only clear outlier is the U.S., where health system performance is dramatically lower.
Conclusion : The U.S. continues to be in a class by itself in the underperformance of its health care sector. While the other nine countries differ in the details of their systems and in their performance on domains, unlike the U.S., they all have found a way to meet their residents’ most basic health care needs, including universal coverage . [That phrase again?—Nass]
The OECD generally shows us the same thing (below) but compares us to many more countries than just 10. When will this get fixed? Think MAHA!