UN conferences centralize control over resources and people. Maurice Strong led the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, resulting in climate and biodiversity treaties, plus the Convention to Combat Desertification. The upcoming Conference of the Parties raises concerns about a potential resource grab under the guise of “sustainable land stewardship.” Critics note vague definitions like “nature-positive production” and obscure language in proposed goals, suggesting manipulation rather than genuine improvement. The author seeks draft documents from this meeting for further analysis.
Globalism tries another play over land, starting tomorrow. The UN Convention to Combat Desertification COP16 seeks financing and political will, and the adoption of hidden documents This presumably plays into the Natural Asset Corporations that have sprung up to sustainably manage (and then gobble up) our land for us. Sun, 01 Dec 2024 22:55:30 GMT https://merylnass.substack.com/p/globalism-tries-another-play-over I’ve recently been writing and speaking about how UN conferences, agreements and formal treaties have been used to centralize control of the planet, its resources and people. Here is the start of the talk I gave last week, which is relevant to the meeting that starts tomorrow.
Oilman/environmentalist/globalist extraordinaire Maurice Strong was the originator and Secretary-General of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit , out of which grew the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biological Diversity . There was a third Convention birthed at that Summit which I have not written about previously: the Convention to Combat Desertification .
It too gets to have its own Conference of the Parties 16 , starting tomorrow.
https://www.unccd.int/media/50289/open
Here is what they want. I suspect another attempt at a big resource grab coming out of this meeting, which does not get the publicity of the other two meetings that just transpired. Look at the PR:
Sounds good. But what is “sustainable land stewardship”? They failed to mention the owners of land in the above summary of this meeting.
We all want land restoration and improvement. See how the globalists are expert at identifying a heartfelt need and then twisting it to justify their land grab.
Funny how they don’t mention improving the land so the food is better, to improve human health. Instead, we need to improve the land to reach the sustainable development goals. Hmmm…
Notice that these shysters never tell the public HOW they are going to support regenerative agriculture and land use.
The globalists invented a new term to disguise what it is they are trying to achieve. That term is “Nature-positive production” of food. How strange that they fail to define it. It must be their bug factories:
Now here is what appears to be a lovely set of goals… until you get to the word salad in Goal 3 and realize they are trying to obscure rather than enlighten the reader:
“… restoration of ecosystem services, sustainable agricultural practices, and deployment of nature – based solutions or ecosystem – based approaches for biodiversity conservation, among others, in order to restore ecosystem functionality in a landscape context.”
The globalists hope to get some agreements at the end of this meeting, but I have not been able to find the draft documents to which they will seek a manufactured consensus. If any readers can find them, please identify where they are and I will review/decode them for you.
In the meantime, here is the evidence that they are seeking adoption of several documents. And this could be very important. So please help find the draft documents if you can.